Leadership Without Position: The Real Impact of Shadow Leadership. CEO, director, manager, supervisor, team leader. These are the official titles commonly found in organizations. There are also other official titles such as section head, president (not necessarily country level), secretary general, and so on. In essence, each organization has its own structure and official position names.
However, behind these structures and official titles, there is another form of influence that can shape organizational culture and strategic decision-making: shadow leadership. Shadow leadership is the informal, often invisible or subtle influence that individuals instil in an organization, without necessarily holding formal authority or positions. These leaders work in the shadows. They make decisions, shape behaviour, and organizational culture through actions, ideas, or connections.
Leadership Without Position: The Real Impact of Shadow Leadership
Shadow leaders can influence others through their expertise, charisma, or networks. Like job titles, their contributions are not formally recorded. They work behind the scenes. However, no one doubts their contribution. These shadow leaders shape organizational norms, values, and behaviors by serving as informal role models, mentors, or advisors. If there is a crisis or problem in formal leadership, they often step in. In the organization, they are the ones who are trusted and respected by all.
Shadow leaders are many examples. For example, a senior technician who is the go-to person for employees because of his or her special skills. Another example can be found in a family business. There is the wife or mother of the owner of the family business who although not listed by name in the organizational structure, her opinion and advice are highly valued. Not only that, employees are also often given instructions by her. There are also employees whose opinions are more trusted than the official explanations of organizational officials.
In a real-life example, the late Steve Jobs could be called a shadow leader when he was kicked out of Apple, the company he founded. At that time, even without an official position, Jobs did not stop being an inspiration for the world of technology. His ideas about design, technology and user experience continued to influence Apple until his return in 1997. Subsequently, we know how Apple has done, especially with the iPhone. This shows Jobs’ quality as a shadow leader even though he is not with Apple.
At the state level, Soekarno and Nelson Mandela have been shadow leaders before actually holding formal office (president). Prison was familiar to them. They were in constant contact with activists and fighters providing strategic direction, and maintaining the spirit of resistance. They taught us that vision, mission and leadership qualities are sometimes more important than formal positions.
Unrestricted by Bureaucracy
Shadow leaders can have both positive and negative impacts. On the positive side, they can be drivers of change, builders of cohesion, breakers of sectoral ego, and complements to formal leaders.
Because they are not restricted by bureaucracy, shadow leaders have more freedom to be creative, challenge the establishment, and inspire others to create historic change. For example, when facing a crisis, which requires the company to act swiftly. Shadow leaders can mobilize solidarity, streamline communication, or make creative suggestions.
Shadow leaders can serve as role models; establish rules or regulations that bind the organization and are used to guide, order, and control appropriate and acceptable behavior; and sometimes complement organizational values.
One source of influence for shadow leadership is an extensive network. Through this network, shadow leaders can break down barriers and become the link between departments, teams, and individuals. Thanks to their influence, they can share knowledge, work together, and create an informal learning ecosystem that increases the collective intelligence of the organization.
Shadow leadership is not illegal. Therefore, it is legitimate for formal leaders to utilize their expertise. Thus, the insights of formal leaders will be broader and deeper.
Risks of Shadow Leadership
However, shadow leadership can also have a negative impact. Formal authority is compromised. Toxic behavior develops. Organizational goals are not cohesive. There is too much dependency.
There can be clashes between official leaders and shadow leaders. For example, there is a shadow leader who rejects the ideas of the official leader. Feeling influential, the shadow leader may secretly mobilize forces to oppose the official leader. As a result, the work situation is not conducive. If it continues, the authority of the formal leader decreases. However, the formal leader is the face of the organization when dealing with external parties.
However, shadow leadership is not ideal, although it can have a positive impact. Shadow leaders who are fond of spreading negativity, gossip, or divisiveness can spread a toxic culture that undermines mutual trust between employees. Ideally, a formal leader really does have the character of a leader. If so, there would be no need for shadow leadership.
There is no guarantee that shadow leaders have personal agendas that conflict with the vision, mission, and goals of the organization. This mismatch often occurs when the formal leader is unable to explain the company’s mission, mission, and goals properly.
The higher the quality of a shadow leader, the greater the risk of employees relying too heavily on them. As a result, creativity, initiative and innovation can stagnate. This dependency can become acute when the shadow leader leaves the company. People in the organization will feel like they have lost their grip.
Exists Naturally
Unlike formal leaders, shadow leaders cannot be created. In other words, they develop naturally with their inherent character. A shadow leader does not need a formal position. Also, they should not be pressured because it will only harm the formal authority.
What must be done is to embrace and utilize his strengths. How can you do this? First, recognize who the shadow leaders are in the organization. They usually have a wide network, are a place where people go for advice and counsel, and are able to change the spirit of the team even without a formal position.
Next, don’t think of shadow leaders as threats or competitors. Instead, think of them as partners. Understand their motivations. This way, their influence can be aligned with the company’s vision, mission, strategy and goals.
Official leaders can invite shadow leaders to strategize together. This is to prevent shadow leaders from acting out of control. In addition, shadow leaders often offer interesting perspectives that are lost on formal leaders.
Companies can motivate shadow leaders to continue to have a positive impact. You can do this by recognizing and appreciating their contributions. This can be done, for example, by giving praise or self-development opportunities.
However, what if the shadow leader behaves and has a negative impact? In this case, formal leaders must act quickly and decisively. If there is no other way, cutting off their influence must be done.
Leadership Without Position: The Real Impact of Shadow Leadership
Category: Leadership
#shadow leadership #shadow leaders #informal #contributions #steve jobs #soekarno #Nelson Mandela #risks #influence #conflicts
Related Posts:
Leadership Without Position: The Real Impact of Shadow Leadership
Glass Cliff: Tantangan Kepemimpinan bagi Wanita dan Minoritas di Tengah Krisis
Bridging the Generation Gap in the Face of the Talent Cliff
Talent Drain: When Stars Leave
Inspiring Stories of Local Entrepreneurs: Hamzah Sulaiman: The Visionary Behind Raminten’s Uniqueness